Last-minute Iowa legislative scramble is nothing to brag about

The Iowa Senate wrapped up its work for the year shortly after midnight on May 23, and Iowa House members adjourned about 11 hours later. Lawmakers in both parties have been congratulating themselves for compromising on some big issues that ended in stalemate the previous two years. Rod Boshart compiled an excellent list of what the legislature did and didn’t approve during 2013.

We all can appreciate the desire to finish a big project before a holiday weekend, and since legislators stopped receiving per diem payments weeks ago, they understandably wanted to get out of town as quickly as possible. However, I found it disturbing that votes were held before most lawmakers, let alone members of the public, had time to digest final conference committee deals on education reform, an alternative to Medicaid expansion, property taxes, and the health and human services budget. Transparency isn’t just a buzzword. Had journalists and advocacy groups been able to look over the last-minute compromises, people might have discovered problematic language or even simple drafting errors, which could produce unintended consequences after Governor Terry Branstad signs these bills into law.

I have a lot of questions about the final education reform bill and the plan to provide health insurance to low-income Iowans, particularly those earning between 101 percent and 138 percent of the poverty level. I also need more time to sort through the budget numbers and final changes to the standings bill. After the holiday weekend Bleeding Heartland will examine the important results of the legislative session in more detail. For now, I’ve posted after the jump details on who voted for and against the major bills approved this week.

UPDATE: In the May 24 edition of the On Iowa Politics podcast, statehouse reporters Mike Wiser and James Lynch discussed how the big issues came together “behind closed doors,” with no public scrutiny or oversight. Lynch commented that to his knowledge, the conference committee named to resolve the impasse over Medicaid expansion never formally met, except perhaps for one organizational meeting. Lynch recounted one occasion when Iowa House Republican Dave Heaton was briefing journalists about the health care talks, and the journalists asked when that happened, since there hadn’t been any public notices of conference committee meetings. According to Lynch, Heaton replied, “We’re not having meetings, but we’re meeting.” Senate President Pam Jochum said that negotiations between Democratic State Senator Amanda Ragan and House Majority Leader Linda Upmeyer produced the “key to Iowa’s health care compromise.” Notably, Upmeyer didn’t have a prominent role in passing the House health insurance plan, nor was she named to the conference committee assigned to merge the House and Senate proposals.

Speaking to journalists on May 22, Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal and Jochum weren’t able to answer a specific question about compromise wording reached regarding Medicaid coverage of abortions. That was no minor issue–it was the last sticking point holding up approval of the health and human services budget. In effect, Gronstal told journalists, you can see the wording after the final bill is published.

Senate File 295, the bill including property tax cuts and an increase in the earned income tax credit, passed the Iowa Senate by 44 votes to 6 and the Iowa House by 84 votes to 13.

In the Senate, these six Democrats voted no: Joe Bolkcom, Bob Dvorsky, Rob Hogg, Janet Petersen, Dick Dearden, Herman Quirmbach

In the House, these 13 Democrats voted no: Marti Anderson, Bruce Hunter, Chuck Isenhart, Dave Jacoby, Jerry Kearns, Vicki Lensing, Mary Mascher, Pat Murphy, Jo Oldson, Sharon Steckman, Todd Taylor, Beth Wessel-Kroeschell, Cindy Winckler

House File 215, the education reform bill, passed the Iowa House by 95 votes to 0 and the Iowa Senate by 40 votes to 10. Dick Dearden was the only Senate Democrat to vote against the bill, joined by Republicans Brad Zaun, Dennis Guth, Ken Rozenboom, Jack Whitver, Randy Feenstra, Bill Dix, Jerry Behn, Mark Chelgren, Jake Chapman.

Senate File 446 contained the health and human services budget and the alternative to Medicaid expansion, which will use federal funds to cover Iowans earning up to 138 percent of the poverty level (provided the federal government grants Iowa a waiver). All 26 Senate Democrats voted for this bill, and all 24 Senate Republicans voted against it–probably more because of a dispute over Medicaid abortion funding than over the Iowa Health and Wellness Plan.

The Iowa House approved Senate File 446 by 80 votes to 17. The 17 state representatives to vote against the bill were Democrats Dan Muhlbauer, Marti Anderson, Cindy Winckler, Bruce Hunter, Beth Wessel-Kroeschell, and Phyllis Thede, and Republicans Dwayne Alons, Julian Garrett, Mark Brandenburg, Tedd Gassman, Dean Fisher, Sandy Salmon, Jason Schultz, Larry Sheets, Ralph Watts, Tom Shaw, and Greg Heartsill.

Tags: 2013 Session, Abortion, Ako Abdul-Samad, Amanda Ragan, Amy Sinclair, Anesa Kajtazovic, Art Staed, Beth Wessel-Kroeschell, Bill Anderson, Bill Dix, Bill Dotzler, Bob Dvorsky, Bob Kressig, Bobby Kaufmann, Brad Zaun, Brian Moore, Brian Quirk, Brian Schoenjahn, Bruce Bearinger, Bruce Hunter, Cecil Dolecheck, Charles Schneider, Chip Baltimore, Chris Brase, Chris Hagenow, Chris Hall, Chuck Isenhart, Chuck Soderberg, Cindy Winckler, Clel Baudler, Curt Hanson, Dan Huseman, Dan Kelley, Dan Muhlbauer, Dan Zumbach, Daniel Lundby, Daryl Beall, Dave Deyoe, Dave Heaton, Dave Jacoby, David Dawson, David Johnson, Dawn Pettengill, Dean Fisher, Deborah Berry, Dennis Black, Dennis Cohoon, Dennis Guth, Dick Dearden, Dwayne Alons, Education, Frank Wood, Gary Worthan, Greg Forristall, Greg Heartsill, Guy Vander Linden, Health Care Reform, Helen Miller, Henry Rayhons, Herman Quirmbach, Hubert Houser, Iowa House, Iowa Senate, Jack Drake, Jack Hatch, Jack Whitver, Jake Chapman, Jake Highfill, Janet Petersen, Jarad Klein, Jason Schultz, Jeff Danielson, Jeff Smith, Jerry Behn, Jerry Kearns, Jim Lykam, Jo Oldson, Joe Bolkcom, Joe Riding, Joe Seng, Joel Fry, John Forbes, John Landon, Joni Ernst, Josh Byrnes, Julian Garrett, Ken Rozenboom, Kent Sorenson, Kevin Koester, Kevin McCarthy, Kirsten Running-Marquardt, Kraig Paulsen, Larry Sheets, Lee Hein, Linda Miller, Linda Upmeyer, Lisa Heddens, Liz Mathis, Mark Brandenburg, Mark Chelgren, Mark Costello, Mark Lofgren, Mark Segebart, Mark Smith, Marti Anderson, Mary Ann Hanusa, Mary Gaskill, Mary Jo Wilhelm, Mary Mascher, Mary Wolfe, Matt McCoy, Matt Windschitl, Medicaid, Megan Hess, Mike Breitbach, Mike Gronstal, Nancy Boettger, Nancy Dunkel, Pam Jochum, Pat Grassley, Pat Murphy, Patti Ruff, Peter Cownie, Phyllis Thede, Quentin Stanerson, Ralph Watts, Randy Feenstra, Rich Taylor, Rick Bertrand, Rick Olson, Rita Hart, Rob Bacon, Rob Hogg, Rob Taylor, Roby Smith, Roger Thomas, Ron Jorgensen, Ruth Ann Gaines, Sally Stutsman, Sandy Greiner, Sandy Salmon, Scott Ourth, Sharon Steckman, State Budget, State Legislature, Steve Olson, Steve Sodders, Taxes, Tedd Gassman, Tim Kapucian, Tod Bowman, Todd Taylor, Tom Courtney, Tom Sands, Tom Shaw, Tyler Olson, Vicki Lensing, Wally Horn

Maintenance Notice - As of November 14, 2023 we are still seeing issues with replying to comments...Thanks for your patience, this will be restored.

  • Property tax reform?

    I would like to thank the members of the Democratic Party that voted against the so called property tax reform bill as it offered nothing to the majority of residential property owners.  Democratic leadership should not be proud of this bill that represented everything Branstad and corporate interests wanted in the way of more tax cuts.  I have to wonder who represents the residential property owner at the Statehouse as it surely wasn’t the Democratic Party.  

    I hope the voters take notice when they return the polls next year.  

    • it's a bad bill

      that will starve local governments, leading to service cuts. But Senate Majority Leader Gronstal wanted a deal on property taxes.  

    • There is a lot of reason to be unhappy with the neoliberal direction

      the party leaders are taking.  Who will raise a stink about it?

      • no one

        because if Democrats didn’t hold the Iowa Senate, we would have gotten a much worse property tax bill (bigger corporate cuts, no earned income tax credit increase, less backfilling of local budgets) as well as a worse deal on the low-income health insurance deal. I don’t see any real potential for a groundswell of Democrats voting to punish state senators.

        I certainly wouldn’t advise anyone to donate to the Senate Majority Fund or the House Truman Fund. I’m giving only to individual legislators and statehouse candidates who represent my values.

  • No one?

    No deal would have been better than the deal residential property owner got with this bill.  

    Lets just wait till election season to see how the candidate handle their support for this bad bill.